首页> 外文OA文献 >Hole-cleaning performance comparison of oil-based and water-based drilling fluids
【2h】

Hole-cleaning performance comparison of oil-based and water-based drilling fluids

机译:油基和水基钻井液的孔清洁性能比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Cuttings transport is a topic of great interest in the oil and gas drilling industry. Insufficient cuttings transport leads to several expensive problems. Knowledge and selection of the drilling fluids is one of the important factor for efficient hole cleaning. It has been observed, however, that the hole cleaning performance of drilling fluids can be different even if the fluid rheological properties are similar as measured in accordance with API specifications. The reasons for stated difference in the behavior of drilling fluids are not well understood. The main objective of present work is to evaluate hole cleaning efficiency of an oil-based drilling fluid (OBM) and a water-based drilling fluid (WBM) whose viscosity profiles are similar as per API specifications.Hole cleaning efficiency of an oil-based drilling fluid and a water-based drilling fluid whose viscosity profiles are similar was investigated. The fluids tested were industrial fluids used in the field and were sent to us after reconditioning. Experimental studies were performed on an advanced purpose-built flow-loop by varying flow velocities and drill string rotation rates. The flow loop had a 10 m long annulus section with 4″ inner diameter wellbore and 2″ outer diameter fully eccentric drill string. Pressure drop and sand holdup measurements were reported. Rheological investigations of the same fluids were used to understand the difference in the behavior of the drilling fluids tested. Higher pressure drop was observed for WBM compared to OBM, and for both fluids, the pressure drop increased with drill string rotation speed. In case of no drill string rotation, better hole cleaning performance was observed with the oil-based fluid compared to the water-based fluid. With the presence of drill string rotation, hole cleaning performance of both the fluids was nearly the same.
机译:钻屑运输是石油和天然气钻探行业中非常感兴趣的主题。切屑运输不足会导致一些昂贵的问题。钻井液的知识和选择是有效清洁井眼的重要因素之一。然而,已经观察到,即使流体流变性质如根据API规范所测量的那样,钻井液的孔清洁性能也可能不同。在钻井液的行为中所述差异的原因尚不完全清楚。当前工作的主要目的是评估粘度曲线与API规范相似的油基钻井液(OBM)和水基钻井液(WBM)的孔清洁效率。研究了钻井液和粘度分布相似的水基钻井液。所测试的流体是该领域中使用的工业流体,经过修复后发送给我们。通过改变流速和钻柱旋转速率,在先进的专用流动环上进行了实验研究。流动环具有10 m长的环形截面,内径为4“的井眼,外径为2”的全偏心钻柱。报告了压降和持砂量的测量。使用相同流体的流变学研究来了解所测试的钻井液的行为差异。与OBM相比,WBM的压降更高,并且两种流体的压降均随钻柱转速的增加而增加。在不使钻柱旋转的情况下,与水基流体相比,油基流体观察到更好的孔清洁性能。在钻柱旋转的情况下,两种流体的孔清洁性能几乎相同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号